"Domain King" and .com evangelist Rick Schwartz sees potential value in .tel
http://www.ricksblog.com/2014/01/compelling-case-tel-mobi-xxx/
http://www.ricksblog.com/2014/01/compelling-case-tel-mobi-xxx/
Welcome to the objective forum for .tel domains! Read it first when anything is happening with .tel!
mikeseaton wrote:Rick is a forward thinker and views his domain assets as very long term - but it's worth looking at how important he views his own .tel at http://RickSchwartz.tel before getting too excited by the headline of his blog post !
What his post is basically saying is that .tel, .mobi and .xxx all had a reason to exist - a "compelling story" as he puts it - whilst the new extensions don't have this.
That's it - nothing more - nothing less !
http://MikeSeaton.tel
As little effort as possible, as many returns as possible.
One more thinker, who didn't knew what to do with a TEL with hosting on DNS with it's 3000 subdomains. Now he became enlightened what to do with a one-page TEL with no subdomains.https://twitter.com/DomainKing/status/839855907408347137https://twitter.com/DomainKing/status/839855907408347137
After 8 years http://DomainKing.TEL is now LIVE! I am just so excited.