kprobe wrote:I'm confused by your response ...
This has NOTHING to do with the provision of a single piece of
information as a DIRECTORY result and indexing alone, my point above.
If the valid contact information is in the subdomain, then Telpages needs to index it and provide it as the initial directory result from a search.
And that is the exact wrong thinking that makes TelPages useless and the directory not in demand, with few listings, i.e. domain registrations.
Very simple to understand and I'll use some examples that started this thread:
Apple
AT&T
Facebook
Google
Domain Registration:
Apple.tel
ATT.tel
Facebook.tel
Google.tel
TelPages:
Apple.tel
ATT.tel
Facebook.tel
Google.tel
Period.
If Apple.tel selects a .tel that has subdomains, fine, but they should NEVER directly appear as indexed confusion in TelPages results, Apple.tel will have everything needed to begin with.
If ATT.tel selects to have a direct link to the ATT.com contact directory, fine, and they should NEVER directly appear as indexed confusion in TelPages results. ATT.tel will have everything needed to begin with.
If Facebook.tel selects to employ an Operator to service Facebook customers, fine, but she should NEVER directly appear as indexed confusion in TelPages results, Facebook.tel will have everything that is needed to begin with.
If Google.tel selects all the above, fine, but they should NEVER directly appear as indexed confusion in TelPages results, Google.tel has everything that is needed to begin with.
Key phrase: "needed to begin with."
This is Telnic's failing, it is not focused as the beginning of beginnings, this is the whole key to the success. (OWNER indexed thereafter.)
Yellow Pages got it, Yelp gets it, Google knows it all too well ... It's just too bad everyone gets it but the Telnic crowd (for the most part).