If they have removed the restrictions on tel domains being hosted (locked into) on telnics proxy.
Does it not go both ways? can't telnic now allow the hosting/parking of any domain on their "telpage" service for a fee?
Or any subdomain ex tel.my.community ? eg using the telpage platform to publish your most important contact info via a sub domain? and for a small fee? if they don't want to buy a full tel.
I remember ICANN stated that the business model is for Telnic alone to decide.
So why not allow the parking of any domain on the new telhosting and make money from those parked domains or sub domains who want to have a quick place to publish contact info?
Could we not see a situation were something.something/contact-us/ is always a highly mobile and efficient page served from a sub domain of your choice?
Does it not go both ways? can't telnic now allow the hosting/parking of any domain on their "telpage" service for a fee?
Or any subdomain ex tel.my.community ? eg using the telpage platform to publish your most important contact info via a sub domain? and for a small fee? if they don't want to buy a full tel.
I remember ICANN stated that the business model is for Telnic alone to decide.
So why not allow the parking of any domain on the new telhosting and make money from those parked domains or sub domains who want to have a quick place to publish contact info?
Could we not see a situation were something.something/contact-us/ is always a highly mobile and efficient page served from a sub domain of your choice?