Telnic turns all suggestions from their community down

Thank you for your suggestion. As some have pointed out earlier in this conversation, there are a number of issues with this modification which we believe makes this change request unsatisfactory for the community at large and for the .tel platform. As this is an ad space, it will be blocked by certain browsers and settings, making it unsuitable for providing critical information to visitors. We do not believe that increasing usage of this space or the number of units per page will benefit the ability to re-sell space on .tel domains, will impact on the load time and weight of the .tel page as a whole and will not be a pleasing experience on a mobile device or other clients that support .tel domains. By using such space for phone and email addresses you are also weakening the consistency of the DNS storage structure with regards to how phone numbers and email addresses can be identified by any consumer other than the proxy.

Additionally, contacts as images aren't going to be indexed by Google/Bing etc so the change would also have a likely negative effect on the indexing of the .tel domains using such ads. Finally, with two divergent views on what the usage actually is for, we anticipate that it would quickly be filled up with content that would not be conducive to the vision of the .tel.

We are happy to consider investing in modifications to templates that will drive benefit for the community and a better experience for both visitors and potential users of the services you provide. However, in this instance, due to the above reasons, we do not see this as a modification that meets any of these requirements.

As this is an ad space, it will be blocked by certain browsers and settings, making it unsuitable for providing critical information to visitors.

there are a number of issues with this modification which we believe makes this change request unsatisfactory for the community at large and for the .tel platform.

We are happy to consider investing in modifications to templates that will drive benefit for the community and a better experience for both visitors and potential users of the services you provide. However, in this instance, due to the above reasons, we do not see this as a modification that meets any of these requirements.

Rambo wrote:I won't waste my time with this anymore!

Expert wrote:

Rambo wrote:I won't waste my time with this anymore!

Welcome to the club!

Telminator wrote:making a break for longer!

We do not believe that increasing usage of this space or the number of units per page will benefit the ability to re-sell space on .tel domains, will impact on the load time and weight of the .tel page as a whole and will not be a pleasing experience on a mobile device or other clients that support .tel domains. By using such space for phone and email addresses you are also weakening the consistency of the DNS storage structure with regards to how phone numbers and email addresses can be identified by any consumer other than the proxy.

Additionally, contacts as images aren't going to be indexed by Google/Bing etc so the change would also have a likely negative effect on the indexing of the .tel domains using such ads. Finally, with two divergent views on what the usage actually is for, we anticipate that it would quickly be filled up with content that would not be conducive to the vision of the .tel.

Toptel wrote:Why they don't do it with Telnic, too?

Thank you for your suggestion. As some have pointed out earlier in this conversation, there are a number of issues with this modification which we believe makes this change request unsatisfactory for the community at large and for the .tel platform. As this is an ad space, it will be blocked by certain browsers and settings, making it unsuitable for providing critical information to visitors. We do not believe that increasing usage of this space or the number of units per page will benefit the ability to re-sell space on .tel domains, will impact on the load time and weight of the .tel page as a whole and will not be a pleasing experience on a mobile device or other clients that support .tel domains. By using such space for phone and email addresses you are also weakening the consistency of the DNS storage structure with regards to how phone numbers and email addresses can be identified by any consumer other than the proxy.

Additionally, contacts as images aren't going to be indexed by Google/Bing etc so the change would also have a likely negative effect on the indexing of the .tel domains using such ads. Finally, with two divergent views on what the usage actually is for, we anticipate that it would quickly be filled up with content that would not be conducive to the vision of the .tel.

We are happy to consider investing in modifications to templates that will drive benefit for the community and a better experience for both visitors and potential users of the services you provide. However, in this instance, due to the above reasons, we do not see this as a modification that meets any of these requirements.

TelKing wrote:Telnic may even be right with the statement above, ...

Telnamer wrote:We have to accept development for Telnic won’t happen anymore!
Forget Telnic; concentrate on Telnames!