The .TEL Community on the .TEL Domain Forum!

Welcome to the Tel.community.

You are invited to participate in the growing .tel
community!

To take full advantage of everything offered by
our forum, please log in if you are already a
member or join our community if you're not yet.

The registration at TelTalk.org is free and easy!

Thank you for participation!

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

The .TEL Community on the .TEL Domain Forum!

Welcome to the Tel.community.

You are invited to participate in the growing .tel
community!

To take full advantage of everything offered by
our forum, please log in if you are already a
member or join our community if you're not yet.

The registration at TelTalk.org is free and easy!

Thank you for participation!

The .TEL Community on the .TEL Domain Forum!

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
The .TEL Community on the .TEL Domain Forum!

Welcome to the objective forum for .tel domains! Read it first when anything is happening with .tel!

Please join the LIVE CHAT for all REGISTERED members at the bottom of our forum!

3 posters

    mystery of not implementing VOIP

    TELcp
    TELcp
    Advanced Member
    Advanced Member


    Location : Sri Lanka
    Gender : Male
    Join date : 2012-09-29
    Posts : 57 Points : 5675
    Reputation : 79
    Warning level : 100 %

    mystery of not implementing VOIP Empty mystery of not implementing VOIP

    Post by TELcp 2012-12-17, 8:35 am

    Introducing VOIP on .tel page basis was on the cards long time ago.
    If it was implemented, instead of diverting to SMB sites, probably .tel would have achieved the so called critical masses by today.

    Why it was NOT implemented is still a mystery to me.

    And it could have been the stepping stone to Name Dialling!
    .tel has to show something unique, instead of following others.




    Last edited by TELcp on 2012-12-17, 8:52 am; edited 1 time in total
    avatar
    fustachio.tel
    Senior Member
    Senior Member


    Gender : Male
    Age : 41
    Zodiac : Pisces Chinese zodiac : Pig
    Join date : 2012-06-23
    Posts : 415 Points : 11801
    Reputation : 140
    Warning level : 100 %

    mystery of not implementing VOIP Empty Re: mystery of not implementing VOIP

    Post by fustachio.tel 2012-12-17, 8:50 am

    Either laziness or a desire not to rock the boat with services they hoped would integrate them, doing nothing and playing the field of we're not a threat and you should integrate us didn't pay off and in my unwarranted opinion if you're going to be a leading provider of such and such you need to be a leader and step on a few toes here and there, otherwise companies and services will see you as weak and ignore integrating what you provide.
    mikeseaton
    mikeseaton
    High-Flyer
    High-Flyer


    .tel domain : MIkeSeaton.tel
    Location : Dorset UK
    Join date : 2012-06-11
    Posts : 2240 Points : 48012
    Reputation : 848
    Warning level : 100 %

    mystery of not implementing VOIP Empty Re: mystery of not implementing VOIP

    Post by mikeseaton 2012-12-17, 8:59 am

    TELcp wrote:Introducing VOIP on .tel page basis was on the cards long time ago.
    The "call me for free" button on .tel pages for VOIP service integration was scheduled for delivery no later than 30 June 2011 - almost 18 months ago !

    See Item 3 on http://www.teltalk.org/t145-the-long-lost-tel-roadmap-uncovered

    http://MikeSeaton.tel

    Sponsored content


    mystery of not implementing VOIP Empty Re: mystery of not implementing VOIP

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is 2024-05-16, 3:37 am