Afilias wants to buy your failed gTLD
http://domainincite.com/18898-afilias-wants-to-buy-your-failed-gtld
Welcome to the objective forum for .tel domains! Read it first when anything is happening with .tel!
Sunrise wrote:In return, he does absolutely nothing.
silvano wrote:Interesting article.
Afilias wants to buy your failed gTLD
http://domainincite.com/18898-afilias-wants-to-buy-your-failed-gtld
mikeseaton wrote:I think there are a number of factors at play, any one of which (or more likely a combination) could mean that .tel and Telnic part company soon !
1. Telnic running out of money (there are substantial fixed overheads - regardless of domain registration count - in running a domain registry such as staff/office/server costs, ICANN annual fee, compulsory insurance annual fee, etc).
2. Telnic/Telnames running out of staff to deal with necessary maintenance issues e.g. if you want to sell or transfer a Telnames .tel domain you need Telnames involvement in the process, since they have set themselves up as the domain "Admin" contact. BTW this is not an issue with Telnic .tel domains.
3. Telnic's registars getting fed up being denied access to the latest version of .tel which Telnic sell direct to customers (bypassing Telnic's registrars) via their 100% owned subsidiary Telnames.
4. The 10-year ICANN agreement expiring in 2016 - I doubt if Telnic have the cash to continue but even if they did the grounds for a well-documented objection would be substantial by then.
5. Companies House getting fed up with the cunning move Telnic keeps pulling (reduce ARD by 1 day just before the accounts are due to delay deadline date by a further 3 months).
6. An offer being made for the .tel registry by one of the New gTLD operators.
7. Kash & co. wanting to get on with the rest of their lives.
I'm not worried at all about .tel and Telnic parting company !
ICANN have access to a compulsory insurance policy which will pay for the .tel gTLD running costs whilst a new operator is found.
My guess is that if someone like Afilias takes over the extension will stay as it is i.e. "Data in the DNS".
Where it gets interesting is if a less technically-focussed company is the one with the cash and desire to take over - and faced with that or nothing at all - ICANN may well decide to let .tel be a "normal" extension.
IF - and I stress IF that happens - what price do you think 1-word generic .tels would fetch if they were fully open for development like .coms etc ?
TIME WILL .TEL - BUT IMO NOT LONG TO GO NOW !
http://domainincite.com/18898-afilias-wants-to-buy-your-failed-gtld“Frankly, we’re not going to be paying huge prices for them,” LaPlante.
Sunrise wrote:Hence we have to wait until Telnic has finally completely run out of money.
Then ICANN has to act instead of Telnic.
mikeseaton wrote:I hope Kash won't wait until the coffers are completely empty ...
Sunrise wrote:mikeseaton wrote:I hope Kash won't wait until the coffers are completely empty ...
Waiting - that is exactly what he'll do!
Selling the company for the current market value of Telnic (close to zero) isn't the target.
The shareholders won't agree to get only a small amount for a sale of Telnic, because the only plan that has ever existed is making big money with as little investment as possible!
If you don't believe me, how else this can be explained: http://www.teltalk.org/t1733-telnic-pulls-a-cunning-move
mikeseaton wrote:
As I said in a previous post TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE - if Kash can't/won't realise this then maybe forum members can help get some results ?
Let's start with a simple tweet - https://twitter.com/mikeseaton/with_replies
di7 wrote:mikeseaton wrote:Does anybody know the Twitter ID for Kash ?
https://twitter.com/telnicceo
4444 wrote:... .tel is a failed gTLD indeed!
di7 wrote:4444 wrote:... .tel is a failed gTLD indeed!
Yes, but I expect that forum participants and .tel customers will support a new registry with all their power.
The current leaders, however, are hated for their really bad management during the latest years.
mikeseaton wrote:di7 wrote:mikeseaton wrote:Does anybody know the Twitter ID for Kash ?
https://twitter.com/telnicceo
@di7 - Thanks for the info - Have just tweeted Kash with https://twitter.com/mikeseaton/status/619626198285598720
It's no wonder 90% of start-ups dream to sell as quickly as possible, and more. Life dictates of their own. In Telnik management no human-engine and no money.Sunrise wrote:This is a deal Mister Cash is dreaming of.
Such sale was and is the only target of Telnic.
Developing .tel was never the plan!
Each coin has a flip side.di7 wrote:The value of Telnic could have been increased a lot by developing .tel into a widely accepted service.
But now, Telnic's value is minus (many costs, little revenues, angry customers and a dead product).
|
|