Welcome to the objective forum for .tel domains! Read it first when anything is happening with .tel!
feeds
[80%] [13%] [7%] 
Every successful internet company is giving away the basic service for free.mikeseaton wrote:The jury's out on this - but when you've put $35,000,000 into a project perhaps you should just give the domains away for $0.01 for the first year to generate "critical mass" ?
That's a conclusion that many of us have reluctantly come to !TelKing wrote:I'll just reduce my expectations (and my involvement) in the same way as Telnic did.
I reduce my involvement also. I am not dropping all my TELs, but reducing them drastically - because I am not a sponsor for Telnic.TelKing wrote:I'll just reduce my expectations (and my involvement) in the same way as Telnic did.
I always knew that.TelKing wrote:Telnic is much smarter than all of us.
I see what you mean!maxi wrote:Any ordinary person could get his salary non-stop for already twelve years or so, then the result of his activities is that the capital of a company is permanently reducing from initial 35,000,000 (+ Landrush and renewing money) to 16,000,000 (or so). Only outstanding financial genius can do this.
I would like to be a such genius, but I have not enough brains for it...Sunrise wrote:I see what you mean!
More surprising is the fact that almost no members of a forum dedicated to a new technology believe in the future growth.mikeseaton wrote:Having just voted in the poll at the beginning of this thread, I find that I am more optimistic than 77% of forum members who have voted on the expected end-of-2013 total registration figure.
That does actually surprise me !
http://MikeSeaton.tel
Perhaps, it was 79%?mikeseaton wrote:77% of forum members who have voted on the expected end-of-2013 total registration figure.
@maxi - another vote (saying less than 200,000) was added after my post, changing the 77% figure to 79% !maxi wrote:Perhaps, it was 79%?mikeseaton wrote:77% of forum members who have voted on the expected end-of-2013 total registration figure.
I believe in the future growth, but not 2013. First we need to see dramatic changes.Sunrise wrote:More surprising is the fact that almost no members of a forum dedicated to a new technology believe in the future growth.mikeseaton wrote:Having just voted in the poll at the beginning of this thread, I find that I am more optimistic than 77% of forum members who have voted on the expected end-of-2013 total registration figure.
That does actually surprise me !
http://MikeSeaton.tel
In my mind, without cardinal changes in Telnic's politics any growth is possible. Change of politics could be possible only with the change of people.Sunrise wrote:More surprising is the fact that almost no members of a forum dedicated to a new technology believe in the future growth.
Very true Maxi - a lot of .tels I've dropped (which would normally be considered pretty good) in recent months are still available for me to pick up in the future should I so wish.maxi wrote:Who knows the right answer, will save a lot of money on dropping unnecessary TELs in a right time, and again picking them up in another right time.
I think that for those who currently keep large number of TELs (say, for example, >300), it is possible to find some tactics for saving money on renewals. It could something like first dropping less valuable TELs, and after that constantly monitoring TEL drop/renewing trends. Then it will appear that growth began, then registering them again in seconds or minutes.mikeseaton wrote:Even if say 20% were picked up by others in the next "n" years, I've still saved a fortune in renewal fees should .tel start to become something "Joe Public" expects to have and I re-register the remaining 80% !
- originally posted on 12 April 2012.TelKing wrote:
Telnic is much smarter than all of us.
Telnic isn't reaching out for critical mass anymore, because Telnic knows it's impossible.
It could mean that if any phone company would like to get/buy Telnic Ltd, then for them it would be better if in the moment of negotiations about such buying, the Telnic Ltd would have as little registered TELs as possible. Then it's selling price would be the lowest and then the purchase of Telnic Ltd would happen at the most attractive price for the phone company.The only reason to register a .tel today is to speculate for a future when name dialing is provided by .tel. But that can’t be provided by Telnic.
It could be only provided by phone companies using the technology from Telnic. And phone companies don’t need critical mass from .tel for that! Phone companies only need to see the advantages of name dialing.
Yes, more community members with doubts about the future will certainly drop their domains after reading this. That will accelerate the downtrend.Sunrise wrote:This discussion Telnic was afraid about and was the reason why Telnic shut the official forum down.
Eh ?Sunrise wrote:Who falls deeply will find enlightenment!
I see it differently.mikeseaton wrote:Eh ?Sunrise wrote:Who falls deeply will find enlightenment!
My view is that they will just hurt themselves more the deeper they fall !
http://MikeSeaton.tel
Telefonica could know about TEL, because it's former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer has/had something to do with Telnic.Expert wrote:But how many companies would be interested in Telnic?
Who can imagine the potential of the DNS?
I guess the only company who knows more about this is Google.
|
|
|
Blog
