TelTalk wrote:Welcome to the forum, Justin!
Even your comment sounds very comprehensible, why I have some doubts about the validity of your identity?
He smells like a troll the 'why so serious' is a dead give away meme.
Dear Alleged JustinH,
It's a shame we couldn't have had the .tel login for validation back like 2 years ago, still waiting for that on your forums but no longer a member, that would have reduced the number of errant and Spam sign ups to pure .tel members only and shown off why .tel needs to be integrated as fb and twitter is with every website.
I've made a lot of problems I guess for telnic but I do believe Jlouis was a catalyst for part of the decent against telnic, I think many didn't get the 'we still own the data' but everyone can use it how ever they like, so I have nothing against what he did which was not illegal, but how his complains where dealt with or the perception didn't sit well with how we imagine you and telnic act/exist/are, plus how others were kicked out made us feel frustrated and I'm sure many dispirited away from the telnic vision just out of spite.
We'd have been much more quiet and got on with our stuff if you'd had kept marketing it and telnic to us with tweets, internal office video and fun things so we know you're human and not just corporate investment drones that don't care for the users aka only interested in the bottom line, as you know any business must keep in touch with it's customers and telnic historically was as you said focusing on other areas and we did feel neglected.
You maybe and have been acting as a registry but to us you are like a 'kickstarter' startup that we emotionally and virtually invested in, many over spent as an 'investment' which comes down to either great marketing or poor marketing as if it was pushed out better they're not likely to see a return on that investment many would have just stuck to one .tel aka 'business' or personal only.
Maybe that's what you should have started with at first, business only sign ups like .pro is for 'professionals only' so that no one became emotionally invested without an outlet to really get down to why they feel it was not living up to the hype, of course we're proud of how far telnic has come but many of us still don't and wont follow your vision as it's all spite.
We just need to get to that stage where we can forgive and move forward and I do believe teltalk could help repair that in an almost neutral environment where we have some control, as .tel really is not about having control it's about having an illusion of control but off setting the responsibility of everything else to you aka telnic and when telnic can't or appears to not be able to live up to the hype or development aspects we're dieing for we get hellishly frustrated.
You ask why we take it so serious? well that sounds like what a troll would say so obviously we can't trust that you are who you say you are, so the question is if you are who you say you are, why don't you? or are you saying you do and have been too busy to care about us? and we should not take the representations of 'us' and our current and future business interests seriously? because you'll take care of it? how are you going to take care of what we need if you don't open up and really socialize with those who have been here the longest?
If you want to prove who you are just tweet from your twitter and then paste the url to it here, otherwise you're just another online troll looking to mess things up, and I'd probably not put it past you being 'storm or pep mysl'.
Register
Blog
