The .TEL Community on the .TEL Domain Forum!

Welcome to the Tel.community.

You are invited to participate in the growing .tel
community!

To take full advantage of everything offered by
our forum, please log in if you are already a
member or join our community if you're not yet.

The registration at TelTalk.org is free and easy!

Thank you for participation!

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

The .TEL Community on the .TEL Domain Forum!

Welcome to the Tel.community.

You are invited to participate in the growing .tel
community!

To take full advantage of everything offered by
our forum, please log in if you are already a
member or join our community if you're not yet.

The registration at TelTalk.org is free and easy!

Thank you for participation!

The .TEL Community on the .TEL Domain Forum!

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
The .TEL Community on the .TEL Domain Forum!

Welcome to the objective forum for .tel domains! Read it first when anything is happening with .tel!

Please join the LIVE CHAT for all REGISTERED members at the bottom of our forum!

    Different views in different browsers

    Telnic
    Telnic
    High-Flyer
    High-Flyer


    Join date : 2014-12-30
    Posts : 2903 Points : 11321
    Reputation : 0
    Warning level : 100 %

    Different views in different browsers Empty Different views in different browsers

    Post by Telnic 2015-01-02, 9:56 am

    silvano12-17-2012 11:19 PM




    Different views in different browsers
     
    I open, for example, the site http://covarrubias.tel/ 

    In Chrome (23.0.1271.64 portable, Italian) I see some beautiful images:

    https://2img.net/r/ihimg/a/img7/136/appunti01l.jpg

    Instead in Firefox (17.0.1 Italian, my default browser) there are no pictures:

    https://2img.net/r/ihimg/a/img145/3093/appunti02j.jpg

    This happens with all .tels with pictures.

    Of course Firefox works perfectly with the other, non .tel, sites.

    Does anyone have an explanation?


    [P.S. Internet Explorer 9 works perfectly, like Chrome]

    Aled12-18-2012 09:54 AM




    Silvano, it seems that your Firefox browser is blocking the images from appearing. Do you have an additional "Ad Blocker" installed on Firefox? Otherwise have you tried modifying the security settings on it?

    silvano12-18-2012 02:03 PM




    Holy mackerel!

    On FIrefox I have installed Adblock Plus. Deactivating Adblock the pictures reappear.

    So, Adblock handles the images as ads and blocks them...

    It's a problem for .tel sites and third part developers. A lot of people uses adblock or similars on Firefox and Chrome.

    Mark Kolb (Kprobe)12-18-2012 02:08 PM




    Aled, can you investigate what image sizes trigger adbockers? Perhaps allowing us to add a slightly different image size might do the trick.
    http://www.kristarella.com/2011/10/images-adblock-plus/
    … So assuming that Adblock Plus only blocks the standard ad sizes, the way to fix this issue in WordPress is to change your image size to something slightly different to 300×250, even if it is just by one or two pixels.
    Mark

    dottel.net12-18-2012 02:10 PM




    yes - that's the problem with using these ad designated slots for anything non advertising... solution is to switch to use naptr (or another type of record) and only use the tad records for advertising.

    Mark Kolb (Kprobe)12-18-2012 02:13 PM




    I do like the NAPTR image idea,
    Mark

    Aled12-18-2012 03:07 PM




    The issue is that in many cases these are ads, so the ad blocker is doing its job correctly to some extent. 

    The ad blockers work on a number of different factors, from the size to the actual content and are also constantly trying to evolve.

    TELcp12-18-2012 04:29 PM




    Also some Adblockers block images not originated from the site itself, means any image coming from external sources will be blocked. 

    All depends on the type of Adblockers one chooses to install in the browser.

    I remember this topic was discussed earlier somewhere.

    silvano01-11-2013 11:11 PM




    It's a shame. 

    It is not worth wasting time to add images to .tel pages using third-party services, if cannot be displayed because of the ad-blockers.

    Virtually all my acquaintances are using ad-blockers, the only way to surf quietly. I myself recommended or installed dozens of ad-blockers to my friends and acquaintances.

    Anyway thanks everyone for the replies.

      Current date/time is 2024-05-01, 8:42 pm