Blog
Where can we collect all legal offenses by Telnic?
Latest topics
» web3 will change everything
by Expert 2023-04-29, 6:03 am
» .tel domains sales from 2009 until today
by Expert 2022-09-15, 3:21 am
» Example for .global domains
by di7 2022-07-21, 2:02 pm
» Change of ownership?
by Expert 2021-09-29, 6:36 pm
» Telnames struck off
by Expert 2021-09-11, 5:40 pm
» The year in .tel
by 4444 2021-07-20, 12:34 pm
» My conclusion after six years with new top-level-domains
by TelDE 2021-04-18, 1:50 am
» The daily .tel statistics
by TelFan 2021-03-30, 1:45 pm
» The big difference between .tel and .online
by Sunrise 2020-12-21, 5:46 am
» Is Justin Hayward a good or bad actor?
by Sunrise 2020-10-31, 4:19 pm
by Expert 2023-04-29, 6:03 am
» .tel domains sales from 2009 until today
by Expert 2022-09-15, 3:21 am
» Example for .global domains
by di7 2022-07-21, 2:02 pm
» Change of ownership?
by Expert 2021-09-29, 6:36 pm
» Telnames struck off
by Expert 2021-09-11, 5:40 pm
» The year in .tel
by 4444 2021-07-20, 12:34 pm
» My conclusion after six years with new top-level-domains
by TelDE 2021-04-18, 1:50 am
» The daily .tel statistics
by TelFan 2021-03-30, 1:45 pm
» The big difference between .tel and .online
by Sunrise 2020-12-21, 5:46 am
» Is Justin Hayward a good or bad actor?
by Sunrise 2020-10-31, 4:19 pm
Most active topics
feeds
+35
di7
4444
Tel Forum
josh.
ixida
Holstern
Crazy
Tim Spears
3dsavvy
Toptel
ricardovazmonteiro
Peter Horn
GordonWallash
Boracay
TelFan
directtel
Expert
Telnot
Moonlight
maxi
kprobe
ntervu
Rambo
fustachio.tel
Telminator
TelUniverse
Teler
Mad Max
TelGirl
TelKing
Sunrise
Telnamer
Poseidon
Alex
Freedom for .tel
39 posters
ICANN complaint against Telnames
Poll
Should we file a complaint at ICANN against Telnames?
- [ 21 ]
[78%]
- [ 6 ]
- [22%]
Total Votes: 27
FrankW.- Senior Member
- Join date : 2012-10-08
Posts : 290 Points : 12439
Reputation : 134
Warning level :
mikeseaton- High-Flyer
- .tel domain : MIkeSeaton.tel
Location : Dorset UK
Join date : 2012-06-11
Posts : 2240 Points : 47992
Reputation : 848
Warning level :
An interesting document - Telnic's 10 Year Registry Agreement with ICANN dated 30 May 2006
Note the details in ARTICLE IV Term of Agreement and also ARTICLE VI Termination Provisions.
In ARTICLE VII Special Provisions under Section VII.1Registry Operator-Registrar Agreement ICANN state:
IF ICANN were convinced by a complaint that Telnic's 100% subsidiary company Telnames is operating as a "de-facto" Registrar (although technically a Reseller) would ICANN consider this agreement to have been breached by Telnic Ltd in their decision to sell .tels direct to the end user via Telnames Ltd ?
http://MikeSeaton.tel
Note the details in ARTICLE IV Term of Agreement and also ARTICLE VI Termination Provisions.
In ARTICLE VII Special Provisions under Section VII.1Registry Operator-Registrar Agreement ICANN state:
Such nondiscriminatory access shall include without limitation the following:
(a)Access to Registry Services. (ii)Registry Operator has made the current version of the registrar toolkit software accessible to all registrars and has made any updates available to all registrars on the same schedule;
(b) Registry Operator Shall Not Act as Own Registrar. Registry Operator shall not act as a registrar with respect to the TLD. This shall not preclude Registry Operator from registering names within the TLD to itself through a request made to an ICANN-accredited registrar.
(c)Restrictions on Acquisition of Ownership or Controlling Interest in Registrar. Registry Operator shall not acquire, directly or indirectly, control of, or a greater than fifteen percent ownership interest in, any ICANN-accredited registrar without ICANN's prior written approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
IF ICANN were convinced by a complaint that Telnic's 100% subsidiary company Telnames is operating as a "de-facto" Registrar (although technically a Reseller) would ICANN consider this agreement to have been breached by Telnic Ltd in their decision to sell .tels direct to the end user via Telnames Ltd ?
http://MikeSeaton.tel
x1y2- Advanced Member
- Join date : 2013-07-12
Posts : 146 Points : 7401
Reputation : 90
Warning level :
mikeseaton wrote:IF ICANN were convinced by a complaint that Telnic's 100% subsidiary company Telnames is operating as a "de-facto" Registrar (although technically a Reseller) would ICANN consider this agreement to have been breached by Telnic Ltd in their decision to sell .tels direct to the end user via Telnames Ltd ?
It's impossible to have doubts about the breach of the ICANN agreement by Telnic.
ICANN is just to lazy to act against Telnic. Because who cares about Telnic and its meaningless TLD?
|
|
|