by Toptel 2013-06-28, 4:46 am
Telnames makes a fair point in this matter:
But as an internet user I would be confused what the 2 domains davidredfearn dot COM and magicianlondon dot TEL have in common:
1. The design of both domains isn't homogeneous.
2. The domain names of both domains don't suggest that they belong together.
3. David Redfearn has 2 domains now. Which one he will tell his customers when they ask him for his website?
My suggestion: Could Telnames offer a mobile website without the infamous .tel extension?
Perhaps the mobile website can be displayed under the .com domain name instead (if opened from a mobile)?
It would help a lot if the .com domain name would cover the .tel domain name in the browser address bar!
With the right settings for the .com domain this should be possible.
Sorry to say this, but the .tel domain disturbs. The mobile website from Telnames has its advantages, but please make it available without the .tel extension that nobody in the world knows.
Much better of course would be a complete solution from Telnames including a desktop website (not only a mobile website), but that would require folders (while Telnames' unlucky plan is sticking to one-pagers).