Yell.com gets the cheque book out... ...and has announced the purchase of DIY free web site builder http://www.Moonfruit.com - details can be found athttp://support.moonfruit.com/home Is there still an opportunity here for .tel - or is it too late with Yell.com ? Probably one for Ian Bowen-Morris to answer ! Mike Seaton |
not sure if folks already know, but yell do own keywords.tel - they haven't done anything with it for 3 years though... so not sure if it was just a defensive buy or part of a wider strategy. |
Quote:
http://Keywords.tel - what a great name to own - surprised Yell haven't taken advantage of the 3000 folder limit and created SEO links to all their major categories ! Mike Seaton[/size] |
And they renewed Yell.tel recently. Mark |
Has anyone tried out http://www.Moonfruit.com to build a free basic web site ? Be interesting to hear your views on the pros/cons compared to chargeable .tel domains ! Mike Seaton |
haven't tried it but have used wix in the past - very similar service/concept. was fantastic and very easy to use and build. note: you can still host on your own domain but obviously have to pay for that, plus removing the branding, additional features all cost money |
Tried it previously, pretty good but sometimes slow to resolve. Pretty interesting news mike thanks. |
Quote:
Not sure how you can even compare the two. Visual web builders are always an attractive thing to offer, but their end products are at best ok, just look at the source code they develop. Sort of reminds me of old joke. "Web developer goes into a bar but leaves as soon as he sees the table layout"[/size] |
How much did they pay? |
Quote:
They paid $29m[/size] |
Money down the drain - clutching at straws. |
Quote:
They could have bought Telnic for less than that, complete with developed CTH. Ian Bowen-Morris used to be Head of Marketing for Yell.com - see http://www.telnic.org/downloads/Ian-...ppointment.pdf - I wonder if he was/is able to put a case for Yell.com being interested in Telnic ? My guess though is that this horse has well and truly bolted from the stable ! Mike Seaton[/size] |
We have NEVER wanted anything to do with yellow page providers. |
Quote:
mike if yell buy telnic will do it only with one purpose to shoot down .tel, more or less like when amazon purchased mobipocket.com this company was the leader in sale books for mobile phone; amazon got it and is letting it die slow at least change strategic. regards http://supercyberheroes.tel[/size] |
Quote:
@supercyberheroes You may well be right - but ask Telnic shareholders if they would rather be shot down with $29 million safely tucked away in their pockets or carry on with the steady decline in .tel registrations that is currently happening - with nothing in their pockets at all ! Mike Seaton[/size] |
Quote:
Telnic sure has been doing alot of business and development around the world with Yellow Pages providers, and sharing the news loudly with the world, interesting statement. :o[/size] |
Quote:
@Telrific You beat me to it - I was going to say the same thing ! Though I'm not sure that any of the Yellow Pages deals have used .tel in the obvious way it was designed to be used - enter your data once in the DNS (via the CTH, from any internet connected device) and let the YP directory extract it as required i.e. .tel being used as a data repository accessable by all software programs. Does anyone know of a YP directory which uses .tel like this ? Mike Seaton[/size] |
Quote:
A shame, isn't it? All that time and resource, wasted.[/size] |
Quote:
Don't hold your breath, Mike. TELPAGES - Just add content![/size] |
Quote:
TelPages is a directory of .TEL owners and users. Content is an email address and a telephone number, maybe includes a link to a social network, or a website. That's all it was ever meant to be to begin with, a .TEL lookup without the Google garbage along with it. Now Facebook is a better page and a better page lookup because TelPages looks like Google garbage. That's the content, garbage over primary .TEL's. added: I see alot more "wasted" pages by the Yellow Pages providers looking better in TelPages than most others, that's for sure ! :([/size] |