Hyphens in domain names Quote:
Most people disagree with me on this item. Can anyone show me a domain with a dash in it that is currently on top of the search engines? I may be wrong but I haven't seen any recently for at least competitive names. To clarify things I'm talking about a dash before the .com/.ca/.tel. Dashes after this are common practice.[/size] |
Quote:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/ Code: [/size]
[size] there are many.......[/size] |
Quote:
1. There are actually quite a few, Google doesn't penalize and I've seen quite a few that rank over their non-hyphen counterparts, if I come across some again, I'll post. MORE importantly, we're talking about Telpages, and so ... 2. Q. " Which will rank first in Telpages, hyphen or non-hyphen ? " A. "... In the case of domains, the standard is the hyphen. You do not want the parser to figure out on its own that johnnysmith.tel is in fact: Johnny Smith and not: john Nysmith Help the parser as much as you can. But then again, you have to weigh this against the attractiveness to human beings, so that's up to you to decide. Best, Henri " Hyphens get top in Telpages ranking, Non-Hyphens get top in "attractiveness" :eek: Sounds like a fair tradeoff - Kash said "get both" in true entrepreneur spirit (and help) ! 3. And finally, for what it's worth from just last month: http://www.dnjournal.com/archive/dom...9/20090923.htm[/size] |
Quote:
Apart from being accurate results and all that stuff, the algorithm is the foundation for the telpages or any search engine. This algo should be kept secret. The discussion around which is better does not simply depends on '-' or non-hypen. Because there are many factors like quality (both on-page and off-page), developement, usage and the project objectives. My suggestion would be an optimised evaluation of all the factors rather than simply ranking just based on hypen ("-") or non-hypen :)[/size] |
Telpages is a Failure Already ? Quote:
Directories don't have "algorithms" per se. Order is not a secret, popularity contests and games of chance are. Intelligence and Intellectual Property Rights serve Order First, Secrets Second. If Telpages is just another game, I'll stick to the REAL reference materials for order. YellowPages, etc. will certainly appreciate the ignorance. Just look at Jepaa and Qwista vs YellowPages, the "Secret" is a JOKE ! :p Dictionary.com and Wikipedia.com don't use algorithms, that's the "secret" to their success. They took "Books" and made a better "Online Directory" too, but it's not a JOKE like Qwista and Jepaa. Hopefully Telnic is as wise with Telpages Quoted from a different Thread: Quote: [/size]
And that's exactly where I disagree 1000% ... (or more) Justin Hayward (not Moody Blues) is just as valuable as Justin Hayward (Moody Blues), regardless of popularity, links, or anything. ALL Intellectual Property Rights serve the "First Come, First Served" Basis, and this is exactly how a DIRECTORY should work, REGARDLESS of popularity. If I go to the USPTO and lookup Champion, I get many results, with the secondary information available to discern if I so choose. People, Business Names, Categories, Etc. are no different. Many people know Justin Hayward of Telnic and have never heard of Justin Hayward of Moody Blues. If Google wants to serve a Popularity contest, so be it, that's its claim to fame. ( .tel works just fine in their Popularity Contest if that's what you're after ) For a "Telephone Book" Intellectual Property Rights Should Be The Basis - Telpages. Yahoo.tel was actually taken on an ANTI intellectual property rights basis, and I hope because of the POPULARITY contest, Justin Hayward (not Moody Blues) doesn't get the same SHAFT. Michael Jackson ( not Moody Living ) should NEVER be relevant over Michael Jackson ( my live, white, can't dance or sing friend that's a plumber ) if he registered that name first. Disney.tel with only 1 link should come up in a search for Disney EVERY time, etc. If the concern is for the popularity contest, pass the hat from your fans and make an offer, or promote "MJ.tel" to your lemmings. There's a time and a place for a popularity contest, this DEFINITELY isn't it. The parser should look 100% at the domain first, domain label second, subdomain third, subdomain label 4th, everyone is served. (or some combination of ...)[/size] |
Folks, the topic seems to be going astray into a discussion of hyphens - no hyphens. Shall I move posts related to this topic to a new thread? |
Quote:
Yes, it did, didn't it. Wasn't so much hyphen or not as Popular or Not, but, No need to move it, I'm done.[/size] |
Quote:
Firstly, I perceived it as a search engine (as I read some discussion what should come up first & so on) and my reference was towards the same, If I thought it as some default directory I would not even replied. By the way Search engines are different from default web directories.[/size] |
Quote:
Yes it is. I guess you should do it, may be club these post to the existing telpage discussion?[/size] |
Quote:
Ending here was apparently trumped. Quote: [/size]
Of course they are, we all understand that, however, Telephone Books are Directories, and Telephone Books on the Web are Web Directories, even if they use an algorithm to search for the list of accurate, ordered results ... the list of accurate, ordered results is the key in the end. No one is going to listen to the claim of the World's First Global Directory and NOT laugh at Qwista, Jepaa, or any other "Potluck Surprise Algorithm" "accuracy". Nor will it be used or trusted over a YellowPages style. Google can get away with it because no one expects it to produce anything but potluck surprise for a Universe of information, and then, caveat emptor as always ! Isolated information such as a Telephone Book (contact information), Encyclopedia, or Dictionary cannot get away with the same "potluck algorithm" for it's contents and accuracy If you choose isolated information, you're a bit stuck is all. ( You'll notice the Google game is suffering, so they're scrambling for ordered/titled/intellectual property lists ) The proper offering I suppose if you have to use a popularity contest would be a 3-fold radio button offering the following under the search bar: O .tel Domain Listings O Secret Algorithm Surprise O Advanced Field Search :confused:[/size] |
Hyphens in domain names Posts moved from a different topic for consistency |
Quote:
But the question to Kash and Henri prior to general availability was two-fold: 1. Will the Domain Name Take Precedent Over Other Factors in Telpages.com Results ? Answered Yes 2. Which Domain Name in Telpages.com Results Will Take Precedent, Hyphen or Non-Hyphen ? Answered Hyphen Other factors are apparently only relevant AFTER these are listed as the primary results. If you can't trust the CEO and CTO of Telnic, who can you trust ? They're trustworthy I'm sure ! :)[/size] |
Simply put ... If someone approaches me and asks me to be included as a person or business to: Yellowpages.com 1. I check it out, type in whatever, and 2. I see results, and 3. I say "Tell me more" ... Jepaa.com, Telhive.com, Qwista.com 1. I check it out, type in whatever, and 2. I see results, and ask "Okay, where's the camera, jokes on me, right ?" 3. I hear "No, We're Serious", and I say "Oh, Sorry, Uh, Thanks, but No Thanks, and Good Luck !" As would most ... really. |
Quote:
TelPages search ----------- Browse .tel results using the official search engine, optimized for indexing .tel domains. --->http://telnic.org/community-roadmap.html[/size] |
Quote:
Yep. Dictionary Definition Indexing - a sequential arrangement of material, esp. in alphabetical or numerical order. The Order is the Question (Directory Ordered by Search Engine) or (Algo-Surprise Joke Soup Ordered By Search Engine) YellowPages uses a Search Engine to display Indexing Too ... of Ordered Lists. So Do Others, What's your point exactly ... in case I missed it ? The fact that it's a Search Engine has nothing to do with the Indexing the Search Engine Chooses and how it's displayed.[/size] |
Hyphen pros: - Cuts the words the way you want it, and makes sure the search engine agrees with you Hyphen cons: - Some people think it's not pretty - One more character to type That's it. Remember the problem of johnnysmith.tel versus john-nysmith.tel |
Quote:
Firstly, according to the roadmap it says search engine, so I assume one should not be too much worried or dictate how the results should be. Because if only "-" domains are displayed first in order then all the people who purchased non-hyphen domains will be upset. This may also influence the future .tel sales. Regarding Google search algo, if that is just some random s#%t potluck surprise, it will not be existing for years. It's very easy to comment on some other's success but it's very hard to prove our success. I am not here to judge "this is right and that is wrong". I am just trying to convey that it would not give a good vibes to the .tel enthus..or the market if telnic declares the order of the results, this is because it could kill those .tel owners who do not fall in the said category. Lastly, it's all in the hands of Telnic and their tech team. One can only give their opinion :)[/size] |
Quote:
Yes, thats right. I would like to add another point to the cons, - It may be problematic to communicate the domain name over phone (verbal)[/size] |
Quote:
Of course it would and it has .... as a necessary ROULETTE game. It's virtually impossible to index all web content alpha-numerically or some other accepted standard. SEO requires daily changes and chasing and different results - random results daily. Google, Bing, Yahoo ... Algo-Surprise because it is necessary for various reasons ! However, for ISOLATED information, accepted order is ALWAYS USED AND PREFERRED. Yellow Pages, Wikipedia, Dictionary.com ............ NONE are Random .... OR Surprising. If Google is "More Fun" than Yellow Pages ... and Google's Algo-Surprise CHAOS is used to exploit advertising and absorbers, so be it. If an Isolated Information Directory takes this approach, and is not even doing it to exploit advertising ............ OUCH if it uses the algo-surprise is all. Algo - NON - Surprise is the key ... I heard the term "exacto-bet" used where, like Google Advertising ... Exact/Phrase/Broad Domain Order is Used. I don't make ANY claims as to what "is best", only that Algo-Surprise is a disaster, I.E. Jepaa vs. YellowPages ... Use both and be honest, the masses will laugh at Jepaa and use YellowPages.[/size] |
Quote:
HA HA HA HA ! Yeah, I always have that problem: "Please visit Merriam dddd, dddddaa, dddddddassssssh, dash Webster dot com " I think the communication problem is: "How do spell Myriam ? You did say dot com right ? " Never had a problem with dash or hyphen in 15 years verbally .... Quote: [/size]
Of course it would, and it would be a positive influence to be sure ! What a GREAT thing it would be .... see tel-buy.com[/size] |